Supplier Series : Kubota Corporation – The Factory That Forgot Its Soul

By /

Listen up, because this isn’t some polished corporate puff piece. This is the raw, unfiltered truth about Kubota Corporation, that Japanese behemoth churning out tractors, engines, and all manner of industrial gear like it’s nobody’s business. Founded back in 1890 in Osaka, they’ve ballooned into a global powerhouse, raking in over ¥2.8 trillion in revenue last year and employing more than 50,000 souls across the planet. But beneath that shiny veneer of reliability and innovation lies a mess of deceit, corner-cutting, and outright bullshit that’s left customers fuming, regulators intervening, and the company’s reputation in tatters. And – yes – they’re cosy with Cummins, supplying parts to the engine giant while stuffing Cummins powerplants into their own machines. Yeah, Kubota was hailed as one of Cummins’ top US suppliers back in 2014, a mutual back-scratching that’s seen Cummins engines powering Kubota’s heavy-hitters like the M8 series tractors. It’s just another grubby link in the Cummins chain, a network already riddled with scandals that’ve been dissected elsewhere by TCAP, without me rehashing the same old dirt. But make no mistake, Kubota’s own sins stack up high, painting them as yet another compromised player in this polluted industrial web.

The “Made in USA” Sham: Twice Caught, Still Shameless

Picture this: you’re a hardworking farmer shelling out top dollar for Kubota parts, trusting that “Made in USA” stamp means quality American craftsmanship. Bullshit. In January 2024, the US Federal Trade Commission slapped Kubota North America Corporation with a record-breaking $2 million fine for peddling thousands of replacement parts falsely labelled as homegrown, when in reality, they were imported wholesale or packed with foreign bits. This wasn’t some rookie slip-up; it was a blatant violation of the Made in USA Labelling Rule, and Kubota had to cough up the cash while promising to clean up their act – no more unsubstantiated claims without clear disclosures on overseas content.

But wait, it gets worse. This was round two for these clowns. Back in 1999, the FTC hauled Kubota Tractor Corporation into court for the exact same crap with their lawn tractors, leading to an order that conveniently expired in 2019, just in time for them to allegedly dive back into the deception pool. Kubota mumbled something about cooperating and tweaking policies, but come on – fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, and you’re just taking the piss. Customers deserve better than this corporate sleight of hand, where patriotism’s weaponised to hike prices and mask the truth. It’s infuriating, a straight-up betrayal of trust in an industry where reliability should be non-negotiable.

Falsified Data: Decades of Dodgy Inspections

If you thought the labelling fiasco was bad, brace yourself for Kubota’s confession in November 2018: they’d been cooking the books on quality inspection data for parts supplied to steel manufacturers, with some fiddling dating all the way back to 1977. That’s over four decades of allegedly tweaking numbers to make their gear look flawless on paper, potentially compromising industrial safety and performance. An internal probe laid it bare, but the damage was done – this revelation piled onto a string of similar frauds rocking Japanese manufacturing giants around that time, shattering the myth of infallible “Made in Japan” excellence.

No hefty fines were publicly slapped on for this one, just apologies and vows of reform. But let’s call it what it is: a systemic failure, a culture where cutting corners becomes routine, endangering lives and livelihoods downstream. It’s the kind of grubby secret that keeps executives up at night – or should, if they had a shred of conscience. In a world where precision engineering saves or kills, this level of dishonesty is nothing short of outrageous. Fuck that noise; transparency shouldn’t be an afterthought.

Rodent-Riddled Wiring: A Class Action Nightmare

Now, let’s talk about the soy-based wiring debacle that’s had Kubota owners cursing up a storm. In 2018, a class action lawsuit hit the courts in Alabama – Burgess Properties LLC versus Kubota Tractor Corporation – alleging that the company’s shift to bio-based insulation in tractors, mowers, and utility vehicles was a recipe for disaster. Why? Because this eco-friendly crap allegedly attracts rodents like mice and squirrels more than traditional materials, leading to gnawed wires, electrical shorts, and outright failures that could spark fires or strand you in the field.

Plaintiffs claimed Kubota knew about the issue but buried it, refusing warranty coverage for repairs that racked up big bills. We’re talking models like the 2017 L5460HSTC Tractor getting chewed to bits, turning reliable workhorses into pricey headaches. The suit sought damages and class status for affected buyers, though details on the outcome remain murky – likely settled out of the spotlight. It’s a classic case of greenwashing gone wrong, where environmental pretensions allegedly trump customer safety. Infuriating doesn’t cover it; it’s a slap in the face to folks who depend on this equipment to feed families and nations.

Patent Wars and Dealer Double-Dealing

Kubota’s no stranger to courtroom brawls over intellectual property, either. In 2019, AgJunction Inc. dragged them and their subsidiaries into a patent infringement suit over automated steering tech in farm gear, claiming Kubota ripped off three key patents. Kubota fired back, calling the accusations baseless, and the case hit a 60-day pause in 2020 with no clear resolution since – probably hashed out behind closed doors. Fast forward to 2023, and in India, Kubota scored a win in a Delhi High Court battle against copycats infringing on their machine parts, but it underscores their aggressive stance in the ag-tech arena.

Then there’s the 2019 dealer dust-up in Florida: Gulf Coast Turf and Tractor LLC accused Kubota of meddling in their business by siphoning off national account orders from a big client like Hertz Equipment Rental, allegedly breaching unfair trade practices laws. The court let it proceed, rejecting Kubota’s dismissal bid, but again, the endgame’s shrouded – settlement city, no doubt. These skirmishes reveal a company that’s quick to guard its turf but allegedly not above stepping on smaller players’ toes. In an industry built on partnerships, this kind of alleged sharp practice breeds resentment and erodes loyalty. It’s grubby, it’s greedy, and it’s got to stop.

Injury Claims and Workplace Woes

Product liability haunts Kubota too. Take the 2013 Alabama Supreme Court appeal in McDonald versus Kubota Manufacturing of America Corporation, where a tractor mishap led to claims of juror misconduct and flawed instructions, kicking it back for a retrial. Scattered injury suits pop up in reviews, hinting at safety lapses, though no epidemic stands out.

On the employee front, Glassdoor paints a grim picture with a measly 3.2 out of 5 rating: complaints of rotten work-life balance, favouritism, and bungled management that treats staff like disposable cogs. Indeed echoes this, with gripes about unfair pay and shoddy training amid the grind of long hours. No blockbuster labour scandals, but it’s a simmering pot of discontent that speaks volumes about internal priorities – or the lack thereof.

In the end, Kubota’s story isn’t unique; it’s symptomatic of an industrial landscape where profit trumps principles all too often. Tied to Cummins as both supplier and customer, they’re embedded in a system fraught with issues, adding their own flavour of alleged misconduct to the mix. Farmers, workers, and consumers deserve accountability, not excuses. Until Kubota owns up and overhauls, they’ll remain a symbol of what’s broken in big machinery – a gritty reminder that behind every gleaming tractor lurks the potential for betrayal.

Lee Thompson – Founder, The Cummins Accountability Project

Sources

Scroll to Top