The Cepac Files : Absolut Vodka – The Dirty Packaging Partnership
Edited 04/09/2026 to correct Miller’s title The Bottle Went On The Shelf. The File Went Under The Floor Cepac Ltd
Hayel Saeed Anam coverage: TCAP opens the HSA Group family machine behind Cepac, tracing the Page/Cepac disability-discrimination case, £25,000–£30,000 costs pressure, ethics theatre, Yemen controversies and the customers still feeding its UK cardboard arm. Family values in the brochure. A disabled claimant in the grinder. Terrorism allegations in the search results.
Edited 04/09/2026 to correct Miller’s title The Bottle Went On The Shelf. The File Went Under The Floor Cepac Ltd
Page updated 01/08/2026 to correct Ms Miller’s title I have written to the Bar Standards Board again about Wendy Miller,
Edited 04/09/2026 to correct Miller’s title Cepac wanted to turn a disabled claimant into paperwork. Horsfield Menzies brought the employer-side
Cepac wants credit for publishing equality paperwork. Unfortunately, the paperwork says its UK workforce is 86% male, women earn less
Golden Africa Kenya – Three Dead Workers, One Unfair Dismissal Judgment And The Corporate Grease Trap Golden Africa Kenya sounds
Scotland’s other national drink meets Cepac’s award-winning cardboard. TCAP examines A.G. Barr’s Irn-Bru display, controversial advertising, sugar reformulation, product recalls and industrial disputes before asking what the drinks company thinks of its packaging supplier’s litigation record. The fizzy orange branding is familiar. The corporate aftertaste is considerably less fucking refreshing.
Edited 01/08/2026 to correct Miller’s title. Barrister Wendy Miller arrived in Cepac’s case like I was low-hanging fruit. Same disabled
TCAP’s Ce-UnPAC’d series returns to Miranda Charters, Newcastle Employment Tribunal’s team leader. Questions surrounding tribunal administration, case correspondence and accountability in the Cepac proceedings return to the spotlight.v
All claims herein are third-party allegations and unverified. Sources are hyperlinked. Readers should conduct their own due diligence. Picture this: