HMCTS : Employment Appeal Tribunal Rule 3(10) – The Sift Was Not The Case Before Lazy Tayler
Thompson’s appeal against Cummins had already been rejected at the initial sift. By the time it reached HHJ Tayler under
NEWCASTLEET coverage: Newcastle Employment Tribunal mangled a disabled claimant’s Cummins and Cepac cases with missing submissions, warped judgments and weaponised procedure.
Thompson’s appeal against Cummins had already been rejected at the initial sift. By the time it reached HHJ Tayler under
Analysis by TCAP. This article distinguishes the documented record from TCAP’s conclusions about what that record means. It concerns Employment
One hundred days ago, TCAP took its first birthday victory lap. I promised a surgical summer. Since then, 161 more
Diageo says it wants to be one of the world’s most trusted and respected consumer-products companies. It has a disability
At a normal company, a manager who claims reasonable suspicion that an employee may be impaired, demands a drug-and-alcohol test,
Cummins has published an inspiring little story about Donovan Joel “Don” Cummins. He entered the family business before he was
Some judgments arrive like medicine. Others arrive like a bin bag dripping quietly onto the kitchen floor. Employment Judge Seamus
Edited 04/09/2026 to correct Miller’s title Wayne Anderson entered the witness box with something better than evidence served in advance:
Edited 04/09/2026 to correct Miller’s title The Natalie Morton Cummins witness statement is only four pages long. It still manages